Z E R O P O I N T A I Q5_K_M 120B Parameters

VRAM Requirements for
undermaintenance__118b-gpt-faulty Q5_K_M

To run undermaintenance__118b-gpt-faulty locally at Q5_K_M quantization, you need at minimum 86.47 GB of GPU VRAM.

86.47 GB
Required VRAM
82.5 GB
File Size
8K tokens
Context Window
120B
Parameters
Estimated VRAM Required
86.47
GB
Cluster Required
0 16GB
RTX 3080 48GB
A6000 80GB+

Recommended GPU Configurations

Budget $40,000+

4× A100 40GB Cluster

160 GB

Distributed inference across 4 A100s. Minimum viable cluster.

Balanced $60,000+

2× H100 80GB NVLink

160 GB HBM3

NVLink bridge enables unified 160GB VRAM pool.

Ultimate $3,000,000+

NVIDIA GB200 NVL72

1.4 TB HBM3e

Next-gen Grace Blackwell Superchip. Built for frontier models.

📊 VRAM Calculation Breakdown

Model File Size (Q5_K_M) 82.5 GB
Context Overhead (8,192 tokens × 120B × 2 ÷ 1M) 1.966 GB
System Buffer (OS + CUDA runtime) 2.00 GB
Total Required VRAM 86.47 GB

Try a Different Quantization

Use the interactive calculator to compare undermaintenance__118b-gpt-faulty across all available formats.

Open Live Calculator →

undermaintenance__118b-gpt-faulty — Other Quantizations

Q4_K_M 67.5 GB file
71.47 GB
Q4_XS 67.5 GB file
71.47 GB
Q5_K_M Current
86.47 GB
BF16 240 GB file
243.97 GB
Advertisement Zone

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I run undermaintenance__118b-gpt-faulty Q5_K_M on a consumer GPU?
Running undermaintenance__118b-gpt-faulty Q5_K_M locally requires 86.47 GB VRAM, which exceeds consumer GPUs. You'll need prosumer cards like the NVIDIA A6000 (48GB) or an A100 (80GB).
What happens if I don't have enough VRAM?
If your GPU VRAM is insufficient, llama.cpp and similar tools will offload model layers to system RAM (CPU inference). This is much slower — expect 10-50× the generation latency compared to full GPU inference.
Can I use multiple GPUs to run undermaintenance__118b-gpt-faulty?
Yes! Tools like llama.cpp, vLLM, and Ollama support tensor parallelism across multiple GPUs. For example, 2× RTX 3090 (24GB each) gives you 48GB total VRAM, which can run many large models.
Is Q5_K_M quality good enough for production?
Q5_K_M is suitable for specialized use cases. Check community benchmarks for specific quality metrics.